How Changes to Social Security Affect Railroad Retireme
nt
As you are all aware, the future solvency and structure of the social
security system has become a major issue in the media and in the federal
government. Various proposals to restructure the system have been made and
the intensity of this national debate will undoubtedly increase during these
coming months. Many of you may have already been getting questions from your
members as to if and how any changes to social security benefits affect
railroad retirement. As Chairman of the Railroad Retirement Committee, I have
enquired as to the impact on railroad retirement benefits should changes be
made to social security. I have also sought some general information about
many of the proposals already put forth.
The impact changes to social security law have on the railroad retirement
system can be summarized in a single general statement--tier 1 railroad
retirement benefits are calculated in the same manner as social security
benefits. Although differences in eligibility and early retirement may exist,
any changes in social security benefit structure or financing will directly
affect railroad retirement.
Under the two-tier system provided by the Railroad Retirement Act, tier 1
railroad retirement benefits and their funding are interrelated and
coordinated with the benefits and funding provided under the Social Security
Act. While tier 2 railroad retirement benefits and their funding are
generally determined by rail labor and management bargaining agreements , tier
1 benefits are basically social security benefits. Fundamental changes in the
social security system consequently affect tier 1 benefits as well as tier 1
payroll taxes on rail employees and employers. Railroad workers and their
families, therefore have a direct and vital interest in any future changes
made to the social security system.
Background
Financing - The vast majority of tier 1 benefits are
funded through a financial interchange with the social security trust funds.
As part of this financial interchange, the tier 1 payroll tax rates for
railroad employees and employers are the same as the rates by the Federal
Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) for social security purposes, and the
annual amounts of railroad compensation subject to the tier 1 tax are the same
as the amounts under social security. Any changes to the social security tax
rate and/or the amount of compensation subject to tax automatically apply to
the railroad retirement tier 1 payroll tax.
Computation of Benefits - Tier 1 benefits are based on an
employee's combined railroad retirement and social security credits and are
computed under Social Security Act benefit formulas. Any change in the
computation of benefits under the Social Security Act or in the amounts of
creditable earnings used in computation will carry over to the Railroad
Retirement Act and apply to the computation of tier 1 benefits.
COLA's - The Social Security Act provisions that
determine social security COLA's on the basis of the Consumer Price Index also
determine corresponding increases in both tier 1 and tier 2 benefits. Changes
in social security COLA provisions will directly affect the amount of future
railroad retirement COLA's.
Age Requirements and other Definitions - Except for
individuals who have 30 years of service, retirement age is referenced in the
Railroad Retirement Act as being the same as the definition of retirement age
in the Social Security Act. Determining who is a widow, widower, child,
divorced wife or husband of a railroad employee for railroad retirement
benefit purposes is also based on the definitions of those terms in the Social
Security Act. Disabled railroaders needing to qualify for Medicare coverage
prior to age 65 must meet the definitions of disability contained in the
Social Security Act. Changes in any of these social security provisions would
directly affect qualifying conditions for railroad retirement benefits.
Social Security Restructuring
Proposals
Many proposals have been advanced for addressing the future financing
needs of social security. They include changes in revenues as well as in
benefits and many of the proposals include a combination of the two.
There have also been different proposals to restructure social security by
creating either mandatory or voluntary investment accounts that would
supplement or replace part of the current social security system. The
proposals incorporating individual investment accounts are the ones that have
gotten the most attention recently and are favored by the Bush
Administration. They involve a privatization or semi-privatization of the
system and a switch, in part, from the current defined benefit plan to a
defined contribution plan.
The President's Commission to Strengthen Social Security, in its 2001
report, presented three models for modifying social security. Each of the
three models includes provisions for voluntary individual accounts and
associated offsets to social security retirement benefits based on the
earnings of the workers who elect to have such individual accounts. The
second and third models would also make modifications to some current social
security benefit provisions.
In the first model developed by the Commission, the current benefit
provisions of the Social Security Act would not be changed. However, workers
would voluntarily invest 2 percent of their taxable earnings in an individual
account.
The second model would allow workers to direct 4 percent of their taxable
earnings into an individual account, up to an annually indexed maximum (set at
$1,000 in 2002).
The third model would allow workers to have an amount equal to 2.5
percent of their taxable earnings, up to an annually indexed maximum (set at
$1,000 in 2002), deposited annually in an individual account. Participation
in this option would require that the worker contribute an additional 1
percent of taxable earnings to the individual account each year.
The foregoing is only meant to provide a brief summary of the Commission's
proposals. The entire report of the Commission is available on their web site
at
www.csss.gov. An actuarial analysis of
the 3 models is available on social security's web site at
www.ssa.gov/OACT/solvency/PresComm_2002131.html.
Other methods involve reducing benefits by changing the calculation of
benefits, reducing COLA increases, and in other numerous other ways limiting
benefits. Some of the methods that have been suggested for addressing the
future financing of social security include:
- Reducing social security COLA's by revising the way the Consumer Price
Index (CPI) is calculated. Last year the COLA was 2.7 percent.
- Reducing benefits by increasing the number of years used in
calculating social security benefits from 35 to 38 years.
- Reducing benefits by modifying the benefit formula used to initially
calculate social security benefits by lowering the percentage of earnings that
is replaced by benefits.
- Speeding up the increase in "full retirement age" that is already
happening under current law or increasing full retirement age beyond the
currently scheduled age 67.
- Reducing or eliminating benefits for workers with higher incomes by
introducing a "means" test for beneficiaries.
- Raising social security payroll tax rates.
- Increasing the portion of social security benefits subject to Federal
income tax.
- Increasing the amount of earnings subject to the social security
payroll tax.
- Extending social security coverage to all new employees of State and
Local
- Government.
- Investing social security reserves in the stock market.
Conclusion
The debate over social security will undoubtedly become more intense in
the upcoming months. I urge all of those in the railroad labor community ,
both active and retired, to carefully follow this debate and to learn about
the issues involved. If someone on the radio or TV is discussing his or her
ideas as to what should be done with social security, see if that person
belongs to any organization or think-tank that may have its own agenda.
Rail labor will undoubtedly want to lend its support in the fight to
protect railroad retirement and social security benefits both now and into the
future and will oppose any reduction in railroad retirement and social
security benefits.
W.D. Pickett,
Chairman
Railroad
Retirement Committee
Note: Mr. Pickett is the Chairman of the Rail Labor Retirement Committee and
International President of the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen (BRS)